Lilia is taking another look at weblog conversations (and I am too). Her posts so far:
- Weblog conversations revisited: an introduction
- Weblog conversations revisited: is there more than one?
A weblog conversation is a set of linked posts. The most natural counterparts are threads in email or newsgroups. From the beginning (e.g. weblog conversations; time based view), we defined that a weblog conversation does not include self-links.
Despite this definition, Lilia wants to study the relation between conversations and personal blogging practices, with a particular emphasis on self-linking. The combination of conversations (linked posts) and self-linking (which will result in linking conversations to each other) generates an amorphous and incomprehensable blurb when visualised. After some experimentation (fortune has it I'm not a mathematician "if it is linked, we called it a graph"), and following the general principle to keep it simple, the relation between conversations and self-linking is perhaps best studied by visualising the following:
- Black: a conversation. All details about the conversation are hidden (in an interactive environment zooming in is always possible).
- Yellow: a boundary link. A self-link into a conversation. That is, there is a personal link inside the conversation already, but no one else links to a boundary link.
- Pink: a secondary link. A self-link to a boundary link or another secondary link.
The boundary links are very close to the conversations (one self-link apart), the secondary links are further away (at least two self-links from a conversation). Surprising as it may seem, secondary links are very seldom in the data I looked at (might be interesting for social scientists to try to explain that!).
Four examples. (1) The small one at the top right only contains black squares: the person is involved in conversations but does not self-link to any of his/her posts inside the conversation. (2) The example above shows a more mature example of involvement in conversations and following them up. The fascinating thing is that not only there are self-links to conversations, but that some conversations get connected by these self-links, which suggest that according to this blogger the conversations may be related.
These two examples are typical in the data used. The last two examples below show bloggers who engage into conversations as well as adding to them personally on a large scale. And, finally we see some pink posts too! The last picture gives an idea how really seldom these pink posts are.
In A model (framework) for weblog research it was suggested that one should look at five dimensions to study weblogs. This post shows that one can obtain a fascinating peek into the blogosphere by looking at just two dimensions (links, persons). Perhaps it is an idea to also add time so that we can see whether the yellow and pink posts occur before (this is possible), during or after the conversation.
Btw, my original definition of a weblog conversation didn't exclude self-linking :)
For adding time: could be difficult to color-code yellow/pink posts if they are linked to several conversations. May be color-coding links?
Also would be interesting to indicate a number of blogs/posts in a conversation with size of the black thing...
Posted by: Lilia | August 15, 2007 at 03:31 PM
very informational... educative as well, i read and felt like reading over and over again....good job!
Posted by: Acai Optimum | March 26, 2010 at 03:45 AM
I am definitely bookmarking this page and sharing it with my friends.
Posted by: aion kinah | March 29, 2010 at 10:39 AM
Your blog is is very sound and comprehensive !I love reading your blog, it transports me. I think your blog will concert brought the house down
Posted by: discount coach | July 22, 2010 at 04:56 AM
Thank for the info, i visit daily actually mainly for articles like this and http://www.rapidpig.com. Thank again
Posted by: Audrey | July 30, 2010 at 09:44 PM
wow this is a great way to show pictures i was inspire . http://www.narutohits.com
Posted by: jim | September 02, 2010 at 07:46 PM
The above are just some examples of how posts are linked over time. Do these links (and the networks they depict) constitute a conversation? This is a tricky question. The colours and the distribution over time provide some clues, but the meat of the matter has to come from text analysis. Is there a common topic that can be identified? Or, phrased otherwise, can it be determined "why" bloggers join the conversation?
Posted by: buy jeans | October 18, 2010 at 01:17 PM
Nice post! Your article is full of guider wisdom and really constructive. Thank you for sharing with more bloggers.
Posted by: chanel bags | October 28, 2010 at 09:54 AM
Thank you for sharing your stuff on blog. It is doubtless that we have similar interests. Something are very helpful to me.
Posted by: air jordans | October 30, 2010 at 09:13 AM
You blog is so lovely that speak the words right out my month. . I bookmarkt you so that we can talk about it in details, I really can't help myself but have to leave a comment,you are so good.
Posted by: Air Jordans | October 30, 2010 at 09:42 AM
church every sunday so i have a good chance of getting into his house
Posted by: ugg bailey button | November 01, 2010 at 09:13 AM
The thing that oneself like to grasping, strive for, no regrets!
Posted by: air yeezys | November 12, 2010 at 04:32 AM
your article contains worthy information which i guess will be of great help to lot of people.
Posted by: Designer handbags | November 17, 2010 at 07:59 AM
mai yifu zai taobao wang shang mian mai hen fangbian, hen shihui keyi tiaodao ziji xihuan de kuanshi.
Posted by: Louis Vuitton Bags | November 24, 2010 at 02:48 AM
Where is the translate button?
Posted by: proactol review | November 28, 2010 at 11:50 AM
I find life an exciting business,The point is succinctness of expression.
Posted by: cl boots | December 29, 2010 at 09:52 AM
The boundary links are very close to the conversations (one self-link apart), the secondary links are further away (at least two self-links from a conversation). Surprising as it may seem, secondary links are very seldom in the data I looked at (might be interesting for social scientists to try to explain that!).
Posted by: Moncler Jackets | January 05, 2011 at 03:55 AM
To trust myself, and believe everything nice!
Posted by: jordan shoes | January 05, 2011 at 08:39 AM
Pink: a secondary link. A self-link to a boundary link or another secondary link.
Posted by: UGG Sale | January 20, 2011 at 04:05 AM
Blogs and forums both provide a way to get feedback from your customers and sometimes you may wonder which is the right fit for you.
Posted by: Ecommerce | February 26, 2011 at 11:13 AM
Coming into a conversation equipped with personal information about that person comes off as creepy. That means researching a person on social networks before talking to them for the first time is not okay!) The information you get can be good for starting conversations.
Posted by: party bags | May 28, 2011 at 03:36 AM
I can not understand anything from those schemes.
Posted by: Rca ieftin | June 09, 2011 at 01:07 PM
wow thank you for sharing.
Posted by: Acai Max Cleanse | July 03, 2011 at 08:04 PM
I totally agree about cats, and if you're able to put together a symposium consisting exclusively of like-minded folks -- those cat-loving wing-nuts can have their own dang symposium! –
Posted by: Coach Outlet Store Online | July 20, 2011 at 08:27 AM
Wow! Great info.Thank you for bringing the article into focus on your site.
Posted by: juicy couture outlet | September 19, 2011 at 04:12 AM